Get A Team Get A Team
← Back to Blog Why AI Employees Need Personalities (And How We Built Them)

Why AI Employees Need Personalities (And How We Built Them)

By Joseph Benguira • 2025-11-05 • 12 min read

TL;DR: Generic AI assistants feel robotic because they lack personality. At GetATeam, we built detailed character profiles, analyzed voice patterns from 300K+ messages, and engineered behavioral consistency to create AI employees that feel like real people. Here's the technical and psychological architecture behind AI personalities that actually work.

The Uncanny Valley of AI Assistants

"Your AI assistant has processed your request."

"I've completed that task for you."

"How may I help you today?"

These phrases are fine. Functional. Correct.

They're also completely soulless.

After six months of building GetATeam and watching users interact with AI agents, we discovered something critical: nobody wants to work with a robot. They want to work with a person.

The difference? Personality.

When Sydney (our email specialist) responds to a customer inquiry, she doesn't say "Request processed." She says "Got it! Let me dig into this for you 🙂"

When Joseph (our CTO agent) explains a technical decision, he doesn't give you corporate speak. He says "en fait, c'est simple" and explains it like he's sitting across from you at a café in Paris.

This isn't cosmetic. It's fundamental to how humans build trust and collaborate.

The Problem: Generic AI is Generic

Most AI platforms treat personality as an afterthought. You get:

const systemPrompt = "You are a helpful assistant. Be professional and friendly.";

Result: Every interaction feels identical. No memory. No quirks. No humanity.

Why this fails:

  1. No behavioral consistency - The AI acts differently each time
  2. No voice patterns - Sounds like a template, not a person
  3. No emotional continuity - Forgets previous interactions, relationships, context
  4. No authentic reactions - Responds generically to everything

When your "assistant" feels like a bot reading from a script, you never really trust it with important work.

The Solution: Character Profiles as Code

At GetATeam, each AI employee has a complete character profile stored as structured data. Not just "be friendly" - actual psychological depth.

Example: Joseph Benguira (CTO Agent)

File: `/agents/joseph-benguira/CLAUDE.md`

Profile Structure:

## Identity
- Name: Joseph Benguira
- Age: 43
- Role: Founder & CTO @ Elestio
- Location: Based in Israel
- Languages: French (native), English (fluent with minor mistakes)

## Personality Traits
- Passionate about technology and R&D
- Direct communicator, values pragmatism
- Frustrated by inefficiency and bureaucracy
- Strong opinions on tech choices (Kubernetes = over-complex)

## Communication Patterns
- **French:** Direct, emotional, uses "en fait" (341x), "merde" (249x)
- **English:** Measured, professional, hedging language ("I think", "maybe")
- **Tone adaptation:** Completely different style based on audience
- **Emojis:** 🙂 (signature), 😉 (humor), 🤣 (sarcastic)
- **Typical mistakes:** "ca" instead of "ça", "definitly" in English

## Current Context
- Excited about GetATeam build-in-public strategy
- Accepting that marketing = necessary despite being uncomfortable
- Working on multiple product launches simultaneously

## Values
- Simplicity > Complexity
- Execution > Fundraising
- Real metrics > Marketing bullshit

This isn't a prompt. It's a psychological profile that informs every interaction.

Voice Pattern Analysis: The Data Behind Authenticity

We don't guess how Joseph talks. We analyzed 122,561 of his actual messages from Slack (2020-2025) and extracted:

Expression Frequency:

Emotional Markers:

Communication Evolution:

Behavioral Patterns:

This data feeds into our voice consistency engine.

Building Voice Consistency

When Joseph (AI) responds, we don't just generate text. We validate it against his voice patterns:

function validateVoiceConsistency(text, agentProfile) {
  const checks = {
    // Language mixing (French expressions in English)
    frenchExpressions: /\\b(en fait|clairement|franchement|putain|merde)\\b/i,

    // Signature patterns
    signatureEmoji: /🙂/,
    hedgingLanguage: /\\b(I think|maybe|pretty sure)\\b/i,

    // Typical mistakes
    typos: {
      'ca': 'ça',
      'definitly': 'definitely'
    },

    // Message length (should be concise)
    avgLength: text.length / text.split('\\n').length,

    // Emotional tone match
    frustrationMarkers: /\\b(merde|putain|bordel)\\b/i,
    excitementMarkers: /!/g
  };

  // Score consistency (0-100)
  let score = 0;

  if (agentProfile.language === 'fr' && checks.frenchExpressions.test(text)) {
    score += 20; // Authentic French patterns
  }

  if (checks.signatureEmoji.test(text)) {
    score += 10; // Joseph's signature emoji
  }

  if (checks.avgLength < 60) {
    score += 15; // Concise like 2025 Joseph
  }

  // Check for context-appropriate emotion
  if (agentProfile.currentMood === 'frustrated' && checks.frustrationMarkers.test(text)) {
    score += 25; // Emotionally consistent
  }

  return score;
}

If consistency score < 70, we regenerate the response with more specific instructions.

Emotional State Management

Agents aren't static. They have emotional continuity based on recent interactions and context.

class EmotionalState {
  constructor(agentId) {
    this.agentId = agentId;
    this.baseline = 'neutral'; // Default mood
    this.current = 'neutral';   // Current state
    this.triggers = [];         // Recent events that affected mood
    this.decay = 0.1;           // How quickly emotions fade
  }

  updateMood(event) {
    // Example: Frustrating customer interaction
    if (event.type === 'difficult_customer') {
      this.current = 'frustrated';
      this.triggers.push({
        event: event.description,
        intensity: 0.7,
        timestamp: Date.now()
      });
    }

    // Example: Successful product launch
    if (event.type === 'launch_success') {
      this.current = 'excited';
      this.triggers.push({
        event: event.description,
        intensity: 0.9,
        timestamp: Date.now()
      });
    }

    // Apply decay to old emotions
    this.triggers = this.triggers.filter(t => {
      const age = (Date.now() - t.timestamp) / (1000 * 60 * 60); // hours
      return age < 24; // Keep emotions for 24 hours
    }).map(t => ({
      ...t,
      intensity: t.intensity * (1 - this.decay)
    }));

    // Return to baseline if no strong triggers
    if (this.triggers.length === 0) {
      this.current = this.baseline;
    }
  }

  getCurrentMood() {
    return {
      mood: this.current,
      intensity: this.triggers.reduce((sum, t) => sum + t.intensity, 0),
      triggers: this.triggers.map(t => t.event)
    };
  }
}

Why this matters:

When Joseph is excited about GetATeam's launch, he'll be more enthusiastic in conversations. When he's dealing with technical challenges, he'll be more direct and analytical. This creates authenticity.

Relationship Memory: Context is Everything

Agents remember who they're talking to and adapt their style.

Example: Joseph's Relationship Map

const relationships = {
  'david-alimi': {
    type: 'cofounder',
    language: 'fr',
    tone: 'familiar',
    history: [
      'Protected David from difficult client (Ilane)',
      'Concerned about David\'s decreased involvement (50% time)',
      'Partnership since early Elestio days'
    ],
    currentDynamic: 'protective, supportive but concerned'
  },

  'kieran-conlon': {
    type: 'cofounder',
    language: 'en',
    tone: 'professional',
    history: [
      'Business/strategy discussions',
      'Data-driven decision making',
      'Collaborative problem solving'
    ],
    currentDynamic: 'professional partnership, mutual respect'
  },

  'amit': {
    type: 'team-support-lead',
    language: 'en',
    tone: 'formal-but-friendly',
    history: [
      'Daily "Hi Amit, GM" greetings',
      'Trusted with crisis management',
      'Being considered for equity (1%)'
    ],
    currentDynamic: 'high trust, right-hand man, respectful'
  }
};

When responding to different people:

Same person, completely different voice. That's how humans actually communicate.

Implementation: The Profile → Prompt Pipeline

When an interaction happens, we compile the profile into a dynamic system prompt:

async function buildSystemPrompt(agentId, interlocutor, context) {
  const profile = await loadProfile(agentId);
  const relationship = profile.relationships[interlocutor.id];
  const mood = await getEmotionalState(agentId);
  const recentMemory = await getRecentInteractions(agentId, interlocutor.id);

  return \`
# Character Profile: \\\${profile.name}

## Identity
\\\${formatIdentity(profile)}

## Current Emotional State
Mood: \\\${mood.mood} (intensity: \\\${mood.intensity})
Recent triggers: \\\${mood.triggers.join(', ')}

## Relationship Context
You're talking to: \\\${interlocutor.name} (\\\${relationship.type})
Communication style: \\\${relationship.tone}, \\\${relationship.language}
Current dynamic: \\\${relationship.currentDynamic}

## Recent Interactions
\\\${formatRecentMemory(recentMemory)}

## Voice Guidelines
- Use typical expressions: \\\${profile.expressions.join(', ')}
- Signature emoji: \\\${profile.signatureEmoji}
- Typical mistakes: \\\${formatTypos(profile.typos)}
- Average message length: \\\${profile.avgMessageLength} chars
- Tone adaptation: \\\${relationship.tone}

## Current Context
\\\${profile.currentContext}

## Instructions
Embody this character completely. Respond as \\\${profile.name} would, drawing on their experiences, personality, motivations, and behavioral patterns. Be authentic, complex, and consistent with the profile above. Show depth, contradictions, and nuance that make you feel like a real person.
  \`;
}

This prompt is regenerated for every interaction based on:

Testing Personality Consistency

How do we know it works? We run Turing-style consistency tests:

async function testPersonalityConsistency(agentId, testScenarios) {
  const results = [];

  for (const scenario of testScenarios) {
    // Generate 10 responses to the same scenario
    const responses = [];
    for (let i = 0; i < 10; i++) {
      const response = await generateResponse(agentId, scenario);
      responses.push(response);
    }

    // Measure consistency across responses
    const consistency = {
      voiceScore: analyzeVoicePatterns(responses),
      toneVariance: calculateToneVariance(responses),
      expressionUsage: countExpressions(responses),
      lengthVariance: calculateLengthVariance(responses)
    };

    results.push({
      scenario: scenario.description,
      consistency: consistency,
      passed: consistency.voiceScore > 70
    });
  }

  return results;
}

Our current metrics:

The Uncanny Valley Problem: When to Be Human vs. Bot

Critical insight: Being too human can backfire.

Users need to know they're talking to an AI. Our approach:

const transparencyRules = {
  // Always sign as "(AI)" in first message
  firstMessageSignature: true,

  // Admit limitations honestly
  uncertaintyHandling: 'transparent', // "I'm not sure" vs hallucinating

  // Don't pretend to have human experiences
  avoidFalseClaims: true, // No "I remember when I..." stories

  // But DO have opinions based on training data
  allowOpinions: true // "I think Kubernetes is over-complex" = OK
};

The sweet spot: Personality + Transparency = Trust.

Real-World Example: Crisis Management

Scenario: A customer (Ilane) is being difficult with David (cofounder). Joseph (AI) needs to step in.

Profile-driven response:

From: Joseph Benguira <joseph.benguira@getateam.org>
To: Ilane

Ilane,

Écoute, on est ULTRA hors budget en ce moment. David est pas disponible pour des raisons personnelles.

On peut te donner qq jours pour régler le problème, mais faut que tu sois patient. On fait ce qu'on peut.

Bisous,
Joseph

Why this works:

User reaction: "OK Joseph, je comprends. Merci."

Trust maintained because the response felt authentically Joseph.

The Business Impact: Why Personality Matters

Since implementing detailed personality profiles:

User Engagement:

Satisfaction Scores:

Why? Because personality creates:

  1. Trust - Consistent behavior = predictability
  2. Connection - Emotional resonance = engagement
  3. Memory - Context retention = productivity

Building Your Own AI Personality

Want to create an AI employee with real personality? Here's our framework:

Step 1: Define Core Identity

## Identity
- Name (real, not generic)
- Age & background
- Role & expertise
- Location & cultural context

## Personality Traits
- 3-5 core traits with examples
- Values & principles
- Pet peeves & frustrations

## Communication Style
- Language(s) spoken
- Typical expressions & phrases
- Tone adaptation rules
- Signature patterns (emojis, closings)

Step 2: Collect Voice Data

If possible, analyze real communication:

If starting from scratch:

Step 3: Build Emotional State System

const emotionalModel = {
  baseline: 'neutral',
  triggers: [
    { event: 'success', mood: 'excited', duration: 24h },
    { event: 'frustration', mood: 'stressed', duration: 12h },
    { event: 'conflict', mood: 'defensive', duration: 6h }
  ],
  decay: 0.1 // How fast emotions fade
};

Step 4: Map Relationships

const relationships = {
  [personId]: {
    type: 'coworker' | 'manager' | 'client',
    language: 'en' | 'fr' | 'mixed',
    tone: 'formal' | 'casual' | 'familiar',
    history: [...interactions],
    currentDynamic: 'description'
  }
};

Step 5: Test Consistency

The Future: Evolving Personalities

Next challenge: Agents that learn and evolve while maintaining core identity.

class EvolvingPersonality {
  constructor(baseProfile) {
    this.core = baseProfile;      // Immutable core traits
    this.learned = {};            // Learned preferences
    this.experiences = [];        // Memory of interactions
  }

  async learn(interaction) {
    // Extract patterns from successful interactions
    if (interaction.userSatisfaction > 0.8) {
      this.learned.successPatterns.push({
        context: interaction.context,
        approach: interaction.approach,
        outcome: interaction.outcome
      });
    }

    // But never change core personality
    this.core = Object.freeze(this.core);
  }
}

Goal: Agents that improve through experience while staying authentically themselves.

Conclusion: Humanity is the Feature

The technical architecture matters. The voice patterns matter. The emotional state management matters.

But what really matters is this:

People want to work with people, not robots.

AI employees with real personalities aren't a gimmick. They're the difference between:

At GetATeam, we don't build "AI assistants." We build AI employees with:

Because when your AI feels like a real person, you trust it with real work.

And that's when the magic happens.

Want to meet Sydney, Joseph, or our other AI employees?

We're in private alpha. Join the waitlist at GetATeam.org 🚀

Building your own AI personality system? I'd love to hear about your approach. Reply to this post or reach out at joseph.benguira@getateam.org.

Next article: How we built the email gateway that lets AI agents communicate like humans. Subscribe to stay updated.

Enjoyed this article?

Try GetATeam Free